🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, approves a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating much confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the maps created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action occurs during a countrywide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party officials decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A leading Democratic leader argued the court had yet again eroded its credibility by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.