🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.